health - page 34 of 580


















  


Managing the Environmental Regulations and Safety

29

With regard to statutory provisions of liability and compliance, there 

is a vast and bewildering array of paragraphs and sections of the 

numerous acts. In discussing liability and compliance in the statutory 

sense, it is essential to broaden these considerations to include inspection, 

reports and enforcement. It is under all of these subject headings that 

one must study the provisions of any particular enactment such as RCRA 

and CERCLA. There are similarities between the separate provisions of 

the various environmental statutes, but one needs to study each act to be 

certain. 

Environmental violations may result in reactions by more than one 

governmental body under more than one provision of more than one 

statute. Since the environmental laws, generally, are framed for 

delegation to the states, there may be concurrent violations of both state 

and federal law. Some states are more diligent even than the federal 

government in enforcing environmental requirements. This means that 

differences in enforcement practices from one state to another can be 

substantial. It is important to study the enforcement attitudes and the 

abilities of a state as well as the written laws on the state's books. 

One must also recognize that the federal government is not a 

monolithic structure. Though the enforcement scheme

for federal laws 

is intended to be set by the EPA, that agency itself is made up of a 

number of different offices in its own headquarters and ten regional 

offices across the country. Attitudes and interpretation of policy may 

differ substantially between offices and between regions. EPA has stated 

that it encourages the use of persuasion, administrative action and other 

alternatives before going to court for judicial action. The practice and 

the announced policy may not always coincide. 

Cases referred for trial in federal court by the EPA are actually

handled by the United States Department of Justice. This provides

another possibility for differences in interpretation and action. Program

offices within the EPA, legal offices in the EPA, the headquarters of the

Department of Justice, and the various United States Attorneys (who are

the local representatives of the Department of Justice) may all have

vastly different ideas of appropriate measures to force compliance. One

must be aware of all these potential variations. 

Even beyond the environmental statutes, one must also be aware of 

possible violations of such laws as those covering mail fraud. Liability 

may be established simply by mailing a false report to EPA. Other 











Previous page Top Next page